Phenomenology, together with Marxism, pragmatism, and analytic philosophy, dominated philosophy in the twentieth century—and Edmund Husserl is usually thought to have been the first to develop the concept. His views influenced a variety of important later thinkers, such as Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, who eventually turned phenomenology away from questions of knowledge. But in this significant new work, Tom Rockmore argues for a return to phenomenology’s origins in epistemology and does so by locating its roots in the work of Immanuel Kant.
Kant and Phenomenology traces the formulation of Kant’s phenomenological approach back to the second edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. In response to various criticisms of the first edition, Kant more forcefully put forth a constructivist theory of knowledge. This shift in Kant’s thinking challenged the representational approach to epistemology, and it is this turn, Rockmore contends, that makes Kant the first great phenomenologist. He then follows this phenomenological line through the work of Kant’s idealist successors, Fichte and Hegel. Steeped in the sources and literature it examines, Kant and Phenomenology persuasively reshapes our conception of both of its main subjects.
Distinguished scholar and philosopher Tom Rockmore examines one of the great lacunae of contemporary philosophical discussion—idealism. Addressing the widespread confusion about the meaning and use of the term, he surveys and classifies some of its major forms, giving particular attention to Kant. He argues that Kant provides the all-important link between three main types of idealism: those associated with Plato, the new way of ideas, and German idealism. The author also makes a case for the contemporary relevance of at least one strand in the tangled idealist web, a strand most clearly identified with Kant: constructivism. In terms of the philosophical tradition, Rockmore contends, constructivism offers a lively, interesting, and important approach to knowledge after the decline of metaphysical realism.
Sebastian Luft From Being to Givenness and Back: Some Remarks on the Meaning of Transcendental Idealism in Kant and Husserl
изложение Канта показалось "стандартным" (не совсем современным по сравнению с англосаксами), но примечателен сам факт обращения европейского феноменолога к трансцендентализму Канта)
По вопросу "связи/соотношения" (трансцендентализма) Канта и Гуссерля см. также: 1) [url=http://bookzz.org/g/J.%20N.%20Mohanty%20(auth.)]J. N. Mohanty (auth.)[/url] The Possibility of Transcendental Philosophy (http://bookzz.org/book/2239714/61037e и др. его работы: http://bookzz.org/g/J.%20N.%20Mohanty%20(auth.)) 2) Steven Crowell Phenomenology and Transcendental Philosophy (https://www.academia.edu/28852161/Phenomenology_and_Transcendental_Philosophy)
